Publisher's Synopsis
Freedom of Association, particularly of workers through their representative organisations, has been a cornerstone of the ILO policy and objectives. From 1947 onwards, India, with its democratic set-up has been a model as well as an object of criticism and comment from the supervisory bodies of the ILO. To what extent are the criticisms and comments justified? Were there any mitigating circumstances? Likewise, what has been India's record in ratifying Conventions adopted by the International Labour Conferences overthe years? Has there been any perceptible change in the approach adopted by the Indian government in the matter of ratification of Conventions, particularly those relating to basic human rights?
