|
|
Probing the Great Gospel Conspiracy
C.E. Hill
ISBN: 9780199551231
Format: Hardback
Publisher:Oxford University Press
View new edition
Write a review
How did just four Gospels come to be chosen as the canonical account of Jesus of Nazareth? Recent books and films have traced the decision to a series of fourth-century councils and powerful bishops. After achieving victory over their rivals for the Christian name, these key players, we are now told, conspired to 'rewrite history' to make it look like their version of Christianity was the original one preached by Jesus and his apostles…
The Bible contains four Gospels which tell the story of Jesus of Nazareth. And yet, many more Gospels once existed. Who, then, determined which Gospels would, for the next two thousand years, serve as the main gateways to Jesus and his teaching? Recent books and films have traced the decision to a series of fourth-century councils and powerful bishops. After achieving victory over their rivals for the Christian name, these key players, we are now told, conspired to 'rewrite history' to make it look like their version of Christianity was the original one preached by Jesus and his apostles: the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John became the prime tools for their re-sculpting of the Christian story, leading to the destruction of previously treasured writings like the Gospels of Judas, Mary, and Thomas. Are the four canonical Gospels, then, in the Bible as the result of a great, ecclesiastical conspiracy? Or does this explanation itself represent another 'rewriting of history', this time by a group of modern academics? Who Chose the Gospels? takes us to the scholarship behind the headlines, examining the great (and ongoing) controversy about how to look at ancient books about Jesus. How the four Biblical Gospels emerged into prominence among their competitors is a crucial question for everyone interested in understanding the historical Jesus and the development of the Christian church.
| ISBN | 0199551235 | | Pages | 320 | | ISBN13 | 9780199551231 (What's this?) | | Weight (grammes) | 468 | | Publisher | Oxford University Press | | Published in | Oxford | | Imprint | Oxford University Press | | Height (mm) | 208 | | Format | Hardback | | Width (mm) | 142 | | Publication date | 30 Sep 2010 | | Spine width (mm) | 22 | | DEWEY | 226.067 | | Academic level | General | | DEWEY edition | DC22 | |
|
| |
| | | List of Illustrations | | | | | | List of Tables | | | | | | Abbreviations | | | | | | Introduction: Drowning in a Sea of Gospels | | 1 | | 1 | | The Proof is in the Papyri? Gospel Bestsellers from Egyptian Garbage Dumps | | 7 | | 2 | | Silencing the Bishop, Part I: The Lonely Irenaeus | | 34 | | 3 | | Silencing the Bishop, Part II: The Ugly Irenaeus | | 52 | | 4 | | Irenaeus' 'Co-conspirators': A Teacher, a Preacher, and a Canon-list Maker | | 69 | | 5 | | 'Packaging' the Gospels: Of Harmonies, Synopses, and Codices | | 103 | | 6 | | Preaching and Teaching the Gospels: Justin Martyr and the Apostles' Memoirs | | 123 | | 7 | | Justin's 'Co-conspirators': The Gospels as Public Documents | | 151 | | 8 | | Some 'Proto-conspirators': Two Forgers and an Apologist | | 161 | | 9 | | Some 'Co-proto-conspirators': The Apostolic Fathers | | 183 | | 10 | | The Search for an 'Arch-conspirator': A Bishop, an Elder, and an Elderly Apostle | | 207 | | 11 | | Who Chose the Gospels? | | 226 | | | | Appendix: Dates of the Earliest Manuscripts of the Canonical Gospels | | 248 | | | | Glossary | | 251 | | | | Endnotes | | 256 | | | | Index | | 289 |
To anyone rightly confused by what they read in some papers and often see on television, Prof. Hill's book will be a revealing, and perhaps even reassuring, read. The Irish Catholic A magnificent, well-written book... No Christian worker should be without this book! Evangelicals Now A highly successful and informative treatment. Expository Times Compelling book...it is accessible and lively...this is a valuable book that is already a bargain at full price. Church of England Newspaper  Be the first to write a customer review
|
|
|
|
|